On
August 13 I drove down to Glen Rose, Texas, to meet again with Glen Kuban, the
expert on the Paluxy River dinosaur trackways. The river level is again very
low, revealing 110 million year old dinosaur tracks, and Glen was hard at work
on them.
Glen
took me to the most famous of the trackway sites, off in a corner of Dinosaur
Valley State Park that is seldom visited by tourists: the trackways that
creationists have long claimed had human and dinosaur footprints right beside
one another. Glen showed me the actual tracks that appear in creationist books
and movies. When you get up close and look at them, you can see that they are
all dinosaur prints: you can see the three big claws, and the hallux pointed
inward. Here is a photo of the
dinosaur track with a supposedly human print right beside it, a creationist
icon. But you can see the claw marks on the supposedly human print. In the photo, you see the dinosaur track on the
bottom, the “man-print” which is actually a dinosaur print (note the three
claws) above it, and Glen’s foot for scale (which shows that these “man-prints”
were supposedly made by giants).
I
learned something very interesting about fossilized tracks that I had never
realized. Sometimes mineral water fills the limestone track impressions. Over
millions of years, the mineralized infilling (which is harder than the
limestone) erodes less than the limestone, leaving a raised footprint, sort of
a negative footprint.
I
also learned that three tracks can be more than three times as valuable as one
track. The reason is that a single track can be distorted; for example, a toe
may appear short because it was pressed incompletely into the mud. But if the
feature appears over and over in a trackway, you can trust the feature to be
reliable, not just an accident of track formation and preservation. This photo shows the famous Taylor trackway, which Footprints in Stone producer Stan Taylor considered to be of humans and dinosaurs walking together.
Creationists
have sometimes made desperate claims in an attempt to discredit the dinosaur
origin of the “man-tracks.” They have even implied that the dinosaur marks were
introduced artificially by evil evolutionists. But when you look at the tracks,
as in this photo, you can see that,
even when the track is flat (that is, neither impressed nor raised), there is a
texture difference between the mineral infilling of the track (which is smooth)
and the rough limestone around it.
Glen
pointed out something very interesting. These dinosaur tracks—indeed, the very
ones we were looking at that very moment—are supposed to be important enough
creationist evidence that, by themselves, they could invalidate the entire time
frame upon which evolutionary science is based. I recall that J.B.S. Haldane,
the famous British evolutionary scientists of the early twentieth century, was
asked what would convince him that evolution was wrong. He speculated that a
Precambrian rabbit would do the trick. Well, right here in the bed of the
Paluxy River is the near equivalent of a Precambrian rabbit: a Cretaceous
human, if it can be proven. Why aren’t the creationists devoting their effort
to studying these tracks? They hardly ever even visit them. We could not shake
the impression that the “man-tracks” are more of a creationist stunt than a
scientific creationist challenge to evolution. The “man-tracks” are something
to use for publicity, not to do research on.
I
always learn interesting things from Glen, and when I do, I will pass them on
to you.
I have just posted a video of Glen Kuban explaining the "man-tracks," on my Darwin YouTube channel.
No comments:
Post a Comment