I’ve
seen plenty of penumbral eclipses, when the full moon passes through the edge
of the Earth’s shadow and turns orange. But last night there was a deep and
full eclipse, in which, to use Biblical language, the moon turned to blood.
What
did people think in the days before modern astronomy when they saw such an
eclipse? They obviously gave it a supernatural, and apocalyptic, explanation.
But even after scholars began to understand that the sun, moon, planets, and
stars were objects in the heavens rather than gods, they still had a hard time
explaining astronomical phenomena.
Back
when church authorities enforced the idea that the Earth was the center of the
universe, and that everything else revolved around the Earth, they had a hard
time explaining the movements of the planets. Some of the planets would appear
to reverse direction. Copernicus explained that the heliocentric model, with
the Sun in the center of the solar system, could easily account for these
movements. But geocentrists, who succeeded in arresting Galileo, burning Bruno,
and would have done something to Copernicus had he not conveniently died when
his book was published, invented “epicycles” in which the planets did little
ballet pirouettes while they circled the Earth.
But
even after the Copernican model was accepted, and everyone knew the Earth went
around the Sun, many scholars still enforced a theistic model on the universe.
First, they insisted that the orbits were perfectly circular, because both God
and circles are perfect. We in the post-Newton era know that planetary orbits
are elliptical, not circular.
Moreover,
some scholars thought that a perfect solar system would proclaim God’s glory by
having planets and moons that all lined up, all of them revolving in a perfect
ecliptic. But if this were the case, the moon would have a blood-red eclipse
every month, not just every thirty years or so; and there would be a transit of
Venus (see here for my 2012 essay about it) not just every couple of hundred
years but every year.
Instead,
the solar system formed out of a revolving disc of dust and gas, in which the
planets and moons formed imperfect planes of revolution, not the perfect ones
that God would have created.
The
very afternoon before the eclipse, I listened to a radio interview of two
astronomers at the Vatican Observatory. They made it clear that, to them, faith
was not a rock of certainty upon which they could build their beliefs, but a
source of wonder and anticipation. To them, faith was expecting to discover something
beautiful and surprising. The Vatican, these days, has come a long ways from
the days of Galileo and Bruno.
No comments:
Post a Comment