In
the previous entry, I wrote about the reservoir of rage in rural Oklahoma
against anyone who stands for the teaching of evolution, teaching about global
warming or any other environmental issue, or racial equality. And I correctly
indicated that this rage is found in only a small percentage of the people.
But
a small percentage can ignite a mass wave of hysteria. The examples I cited
last time, especially the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, are famous. And even
if they do not ignite hysteria, a small number of people can wreak havoc if
they have and use guns, which, as I mentioned, the Confederacy of rural
Oklahoma certainly does, though they have so far chosen not to use them. And,
as any of the numerous recent shootings indicate, all it takes is one person.
Yes,
all it takes is one person. My example is the man, Steve Raucci, who carried
out 62 acts of vandalism, including terrorist acts (setting explosives on
people’s cars and trying to burn down their houses, throwing burning newspapers
into occupied bathroom stalls), in Schenectady, NY. Ira Glass tells his story
on the “Petty Tyrant” episode of This American Life. Even
though the police and most of the people who were repeatedly victimized
knew who was carrying out these terrorist acts, the police could not even get a
warrant, not even to search the man’s office at a public middle school (an
office that belonged to the taxpayers), until someone secretly recorded a
nearly complete confession from the terrorist. Until that complete confession
was placed in evidence, the people who worked at Mt. Pleasant Middle School
were helpless, unless they had their own guns, which were not permitted at
work. Raucci even had a bomb in his office, ready to use. His gripes were
personal, not political or religious; imagine what he would have done if he
thought himself an agent of God!
This
is why I do not want to openly pursue, other than this blog and on Facebook,
the story of the rural Oklahoma armed Confederacy. I will not campaign against
it where I live. If any Confederates were to decide to take violent action
against me, there is virtually nothing I could do to stop them. They could
spray-paint my house, or try to burn it down, they could put bombs on my car,
and law enforcement would be unable to stop them. (And perhaps, based on my
observations, some law enforcement
agencies would not try.) Steve Raucci did all of these things to his victims,
without law enforcement being able to even investigate him other than to record
anecdotal observations. I strongly believe Campus Security officers where I
work are doing and will do whatever they can to investigate some instances of
crimes already committed against faculty on our campus, but their powers are
limited.
So,
I have chosen to tell you all about the rural Oklahoma Confederacy and the
potential dangers it poses, but I am not going to start any actions against it,
even speaking out in public, except in these blog and Facebook outlets. I feel
like a Syrian unable to say anything bad about Assad, or a Russian unable to
say anything bad about Putin. I merely point out that the same situation exists
in America, though it is not enforced by the government as it is in Syria and
Russia.
Of
course, the NRA would say that I could get lots of guns and have them ready to
hand at any time and wherever I am. This is in fact what one NRA spokesman said
regarding the Charleston church shootings: if the people in church all had
guns, they could have stopped the shooter. He was seriously suggesting that
people take their guns to church. I cannot have guns at my workplace, a
university. I am certain that our enrollments, already low, would drop
disastrously if the Oklahoma state government instituted (as has been proposed)
a policy for professors to have firearms in class. Students would, rightly,
fear for their safety in such an environment. And as for my home or on my
person at other times? I’m not saying whether I am armed or not. But I am
certain that such a defense is, or would be, imperfect.
As
I wrote before, rural Oklahoma crawls with people who are angry and delusional
enough that they could, if they chose, use guns against people who disagree
with them about evolution, global warming, environmental issues in general, or
racial equality. So far, they have chosen to not do so. And we cannot really
protect ourselves against them. The story of Steve Raucci proves this.
No comments:
Post a Comment