I live
and work in Oklahoma. It is one of the reddest and most fundamentalist states.
But we could look down our noses at California and say, at least we
don’t have earthquakes.
But that
has changed recently. And I don’t mean over geological time. According to an
article in the March 16 (2018) issue of Science,
Oklahoma has had a 900-fold increase
in earthquakes just since 2009. Thea Hincke, Willy Aspinall, Roger Cooke, and Thomas
Gernon begin their article (“Oklahoma’s induced seismicity strongly linked to
groundwater injection depth”) begins with this sentence (in the abstract): “The
sharp rise in Oklahoma seismicity since 2009 is due to wastewater injection.”
They indicate that Oklahoma is “the most seismically active region in the
contiguous United States.”
This
process, also known as “fracking,” uses high pressure wastewater to push oil out
of tiny pores in the rock. To the Oklahoma government, oil production is the
one and only energy policy for the future. Alternative energy, such as solar
and wind, or increased energy efficiency, were unthinkable. The only
possibility was to increase oil production and to keep using oil, and only oil,
as inefficiently as ever, no matter what the consequences. The oil companies
could get anything they wanted from the Oklahoma government, including the
lowest gross production tax in the country. Of the nine major oil-producing
states, Oklahoma has the lowest tax rate for oil companies, according to this graphic from okpolicy,org:
And the government of Oklahoma will do almost anything, including
destruction of the quality of education, to keep that rate low, and to
discourage energy efficiency and alternative energy sources. Therefore, the
Oklahoma government considered fracking to be our only hope.
Starting
in 2009, Oklahoma experienced a massive increase in earthquake frequency and
intensity, especially in the very locations that had the most fracking, according to this graphic published in the Science article:
For several years, the government officially denied that there
was any connection between fracking and earthquakes. When the state
seismologist Austin Holland said that the evidence was conclusive, the dean of
University of Oklahoma’s College of Earth and Energy told him that the results were
unacceptable. A vast amount of the College’s funding comes from oil companies.
In 2013 Holland was summoned to a meeting with OU President David Boren and Harold
Hamm, CEO of an oil company, where he was also told that he should not say
anything negative about fracking, according to this article in the Norman
Transcript, the newspaper of the city in which OU is located.
Late last year, Holland testified that this pressure was his principal reason
for leaving Oklahoma. He was assured that he had complete academic freedom, but
the university also had the freedom to make him shut up or leave.
In 2016,
the frequency and intensity of earthquakes became so bad that the Oklahoma
Corporation Commission shut down 37 fracking sites, but only after a large
earthquake caused so much damage that even the oil companies could not ignore
it.
According
to the Science article, the chance of
an earthquake is greatly reduced if the wastewater injection is kept away from
the hard, base rock layer underneath the oil-bearing layers. While placing
depth limits on fracking, it may be possible to continue fracking without
having as many earthquakes. But my point is that it took a catastrophe for
Oklahoma to even admit that fracking ever caused any earthquakes at all.
Meanwhile,
residents of central Oklahoma continue to experience earthquakes. Oklahoma
residents pay all the costs for the damage, while the oil companies get all the
profit from the fracked oil. Support structures are beginning to tilt, and
floors to crack open, even outside of the earthquake zone. We are simply used
to this in Oklahoma; we simply recognize that corporations can do almost
anything they want no matter what damage it may cause to ordinary citizens.
Oklahoma
is now world-famous. The authors of this study were British and Dutch. Science
is read worldwide. I suspect, however, that most Oklahomans do not know or care
what anyone else in the world thinks about our state.
No comments:
Post a Comment