Well,
today I started teaching my general biology class about global warming, as I do
every semester. Since I write science books (of which I have published four)
and novels (thus far unpublished), I began thinking about why global warming is
not a more prevalent theme in fiction. I thought about this as I walked to
work. Walking is a good way to promote health but also to save energy and
reduce carbon emissions. It is also a good time to think.
Global
warming does figure prominently in most of the future scenarios of science
fiction novels. However, the global warming that is occurring right now is
largely absent from fiction. Why?
The
main reason is that global warming is very real and is accelerating, but is
still a largely gradual process. It is occurring over a time scale that does
not lend itself to a plot line very easily. You can’t see it. You can see
weather, but you can’t see climate change. You could write a novel about a big
storm, but there have always been big storms; the novel would be about the
storm, not about climate change. It is impossible to say that any particular
storm (such as the one occurring right now in the Northeast) is or is not due
to global warming. Any particular storm may or may not have occurred even
without global warming. All we can say is that global warming is making storms
stronger in general. How do you get a plot out of that?
There
have been at least three movies or books based on global warming, and they
illustrate three approaches to making fictional drama out of global warming.
First,
in the 1990s, there was a TV movie called The
Fire Next Time. The approach it took was to show how global warming
shattered a family’s personal economy (the main character was a gulf shrimper)
and how they came back together in the end. The plot was about the family, with
global warming just being the background setting.
Second,
a few years back, the movie Day After
Tomorrow showed incredibly dramatic weather events. The movie started with
a sudden fracture of an ice sheet and ended with a huge storm paralyzing New
York City (even worse than the one that is descending upon them this week). This
movie derived its plot line from exaggerating the trends of global warming. The
ice is indeed melting (according to a study I read about today in the French media but have not seen in the American media yet), but it is usually hard to see.
Antarctica still has a lot of ice.
Third,
who could forget one of Michael Crichton’s last novels, State of Fear? In this novel, Crichton depicted all scientists,
except a few brave outsiders, as filthy liars who have not merely invented
global warming but who are actually causing the breakup of glaciers by setting
off bombs! Scientists are part of a worldwide conspiracy, and they track down
the true heroes (the ones who believe everything the Koch Brothers say) by
following them in their evil blue Priuses. It was a poorly written novel that
strained credulity so much that it was a third-rate piece of hack work. Every
plot component was weak. This, from the man who wrote much better books such as
Andromeda Strain and Jurassic Park?
None
of these works are actually about global warming. Is it possible to have a
novel about global warming that is realistic yet also dramatic? Maybe one that
is set in Bangladesh. Rising sea levels may inundate half of the country—including
their incredibly productive agricultural land—this century. Could Bangladeshis
flee over the border into India? India is already building a big fence to keep
them out.
(Photo from Brisbane Times)
Maybe
a young Indian man and young Bangladeshi woman could meet one another and kiss
through the fence…I see plot potential here…Aside from something like this,
global warming remains a major threat that is huge but slow, and which even
those of us who study it have to measure its components rather than actually
seeing it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete