I
know I have written about this topic previously, but I have a new story to
relate to you about it.
There
is a certain state senator in Oklahoma, whose name some of you know but which I
will not here publish, who is infamous for being an extreme creationist. (He
represents me in the state senate.) Every year he introduces legislation that
supposedly protects the rights of creationist students, rights that are already
protected. He insists on a top-down, big-government solution to a nonexistent
problem, something you would not expect from a Republican. He gets little
support even from fellow Republicans.
But
it appears that he has open disdain for God’s creation, if that is what nature
is.
One
of our best undergraduate students presented a poster at the state capitol
during a research symposium. State representatives and senators were free to
roam around and see the exciting scientific research being done by
undergraduates in Oklahoma. Our student’s poster was about stream reclamation
and the reduction of water pollution. She won a prize for the quality of her
work.
The
state senator referred to above was one of the ones who went around looking at
the posters. He asked the student whether her research was directly related to
human health. She indicated that it was indirectly related to human health,
through the promotion of environmental quality. The senator derisively wondered
who would possibly fund scientific research that was not directly related to
human health. The student indicated that it was sponsored, in part, by a
federal grant. The senator responded that wasting money was typical of the
federal government.
This
senator openly sneered at one of the best undergrad students at the university in his own district. And he did so by
openly stating that anything having to do with the natural world was not worth
studying. He was openly dismissive of both science education and God’s
creation.
This
is not always the way Republicans behave. Our local state representative, also
a Republican, visited with the student and was respectful of the quality of the
work.
I
suspect that, for this senator, creationism is merely a political tool. When he
campaigns, he can say that he is defending God against the evil worshippers of
Satan, which apparently includes many or most of his fellow Republicans who do
not support his extremism. This senator apparently thinks that God was stupid
for having created anything in the world other than humans and those things
that humans directly use. God created many species that we not only do not use
but do not even know; what kind of stupid God would have created all these
species without asking this senator’s permission first? Or, more likely, this
senator doesn’t really believe in God at all and just uses God as a political
tool.
I
could respect environmentalist creationists. I’m still waiting to find one.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteProfessor Rice, I am reading your book "Life of Earth," and I would like you to know that I am an environmentalist creationist. I firmly believe that there is a God and that this universe was created by this Supreme Being. I believe that this beautiful world was given to us to care for and use for our benefit. The using part we have done extremely well, the caring for part not so much. I am not a politician or anyone that a politician would listen to, so perhaps I am not what you are looking for. But, I do believe that there are more of us out here than you think.
ReplyDelete