The
last couple of days, I have had the privilege of working, again, with Glen
Kuban down in the bed of the Paluxy River near Glen Rose, Texas (Dinosaur
Valley State Park). Usually we work alone, or with a couple of other people,
but this time there was a little crowd. A BBC film crew brought their cameras
and even a photographic drone to get video footage of the dinosaur trackways,
which I have written about numerous times previously in this blog, for example here). They also
came to interview Glen, who has worked on these tracks (and knows each
footprint by name) for 37 years, and he will not get some worldwide recognition
for the work he has done. Congratulations, Glen! You deserve it.
Watch
for the BBC video when it comes out. It will be called Rediscovering T Rex. The trackways in the park are not T. rex, but
there are very few verified footprints of T. rex. But in the Paluxy river bed
you can see long trackways of Acrocanthosaurus,
which was similar to T. rex in many ways. The BBC does not yet have an American
distributor for this video, so far only Canada and France, but I’ll bet that
within a year or so you can find the video on Amazon or your local library.
I
have posted a YouTube video of Glen and the film
crew, if you want to experience what it was like to be there.
We
were at the trackway site that was made infamous in the 1970s-era creationist
movie Footprints in Stone, where
creationists claimed that human footprints overlapped dinosaur footprints, thus
proving, they claimed, that the entire evolutionary timetable of Earth history
was wrong. The evidence of human footprints in 110-million-year-old mud (now
limestone) was skimpy and some of it faked. Most creationists, even those who
have not publicly disavowed the “manprints of the Paluxy,” pretty much ignore
them. The son of the producer of the creationist movie, when he discovered that
his father had misled his viewers about these footprints, destroyed all
remaining copies of the movie. There was no discussion of this uniquely
American controversy with the BBC crew, even though they knew about it, because
it is such a dead issue even among creationists; certainly European viewers
would wonder why anyone took so much as two breaths to talk about the supposed
man-prints.
But
there are still passionate creationists, mostly in the Glen Rose vicinity, who
believe that the supposed man-tracks are real and that they prove that not only
are all evolutionary scientists wrong, but even most creationists. They are a
crazy little cult. They still have a museum right near the state park, although it appears to be on the skids and is now
only open two days a week. I have posted essays in this blog about the Mantrack
cult in the past (for example here).
The state park personnel who were with Glen, me, and the BBC crew told me that
this little cult has so effectively spread the hoax that lots of visitors still
ask them how to find the man-tracks. It gets pretty intense sometimes, and
rather than to create a confrontation, the park personnel sometimes have to
simply walk away or busy themselves with some other park visitor.
We
sort of expected that some members of this cult would come and try to disrupt the
BBC filming. This did not happen, however, perhaps because there were a half
dozen park employees on the scene. This track site is hard to find but the cult
members, some of whom own adjacent land, can get there. They act as if they
also own the river bed, and have in the past tried to keep Glen from studying
the tracks. Actually, the river bed belongs to the state of Texas.
But
one of the cult members came by, claiming that he was taking photographs for
the City of Glen Rose. I very much doubt that the city government actually sent
him, however. They might have posted some of his photos in the past, but he was
acting in no official capacity. Of course, this man, whose name I forgot, and
just as well, started going through his little speech about how belief in the
man-tracks took less faith than belief in what he called “strict evolution.”
Glen had told me beforehand almost verbatim what this little speech would be.
It is as if the cult members are programmed to give their little speeches, and
they will not respond to anything you say. They act as if they are brainwashed.
But
that was not actually the precipitating event. The man started by saying that a
cold front was coming through this weekend, and that it would only be about 92
degrees instead of the normal 97 degrees. This, he claimed, disproved the
entire science of global warming. As I am one of the climate scientists that
Donald Trump hates and Emmanuel Macron loves, I had to point out that this was
an invalid conclusion. Global warming does not mean that temperatures never
decrease; it means that they increase more,
and more often, than they decrease. Well, this was all the cue he needed to
self-identify as a right-wing extremist (or words to that effect; I did not yet
so label him) and launch into his speech.
This
man went on to comment on the fact that paleontologists have stopped using the
genus name Paluxysaurus and started
using Sauroposeidon instead. This
shows, said the man, that scientists are wrong about this and, why not,
everything else also. But changing names of organisms reflects the ongoing
process of coming to better understand the evolutionary history of the
organisms. And, of course, science advances because scientists make mistakes
and then learn from them, something that religious cults almost by definition
cannot do. Cults believe themselves to be directly inspired by God, and to
admit one mistake totally undermines their reason for being.
I
wish to make two points from this. First, the religious fundamentalists are now
attacking all of science and education on two fronts. Formerly, they focused
all their attention on evolution. Now, they also consider climate scientists to
be servants of Satan. This is why scientific and educational organizations, all
the way from national and international organizations such as the AAAS and NCSE to local ones such as the Oklahoma Academy ofScience and Oklahomans for Excellencein Science Education, of both of which
organizations I am a past president, disseminate as much information about climate
science as about evolutionary science.
The
second point explains the title of this essay. The lumpy limestone of Dinosaur
Valley State Park has proven to be one of the most creative blank slates upon
which a religious cult can write its own version of the history of the
universe. The dinosaur footprints are real enough. The supposed man-tracks are
incomplete dinosaur footprints. On some of these prints, the dinosaur toes have
eroded away. On others, the creationists have deliberately ignored the dinosaur
toe prints. Early creationists film footage and notes show clearly that they knew the dinosaur toe marks were
present. In a few infamous instances, creationists have even carved human toes
on the dinosaur prints, or carved entire fake human footprints in the
limestone. Rather than getting insights from the evidence in the limestone,
they have used the limestone as a blank notebook on which to write their own
version of reality, a version not even shared by most creationists.
It
is unclear whether these cult members are dangerous. Of the hundreds of videos
I have posted on my Darwin Youtube channel,
the only ones on which rabidly angry comments have been posted were those in
which I showed Glen Kuban at work in the Paluxy riverbed. A couple of times I
have wondered whether to report these creationists to the FBI, but their
comments were just short of personal threat. Of course, there were atheist
comments also, which insulted the creationists. The creationist comments did
not threaten the atheist commentators, Glen, or myself with any violence; they
merely hoped that God would rain down
fire and brimstone from the sky to destroy us and our children, that’s all. The
blank pages of limestone on which this cult writes its version of reality
includes at least the hope that everyone who disagrees with them will be
destroyed.
No comments:
Post a Comment