Showing posts with label Mississippian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mississippian. Show all posts

Friday, September 22, 2023

The Climate Has Changed Before, So Don't Worry?

Nearly everyone now knows that climate change is real, and that humans are either causing it or making it worse. So I don’t discuss it with anyone anymore. I had a contract to write Encyclopedia of Global Warming for Facts on File but they discontinued the project. Fortunately I got paid an advance for just writing a headword list.

Now the fossil fuel protagonist argument is, “The climate has changed before, so don’t worry about it. Just keep buying our oil and gas, and let us make our money, and quit whining.” This is a really bad argument. The reason is that, yes, the climate has changed, even within the past millennium, but it has had disastrous effects on societies. So the argument that we don’t need to take any action to prevent climate change is like saying, “The Black Death didn’t kill everyone, therefore we do not need medicine and public health.”

About 800 years ago, a great civilization collapsed. It was the Misssissippian culture, which covered most of eastern North America, centered in what is now Cahokia, Illinois. Never heard of it? That’s because most pre-contact Native American history has been erased from our national consciousness.

Cahokia was one of the biggest cities in the world at that time. The only way it could support the number of people that it did was because of intensive agriculture, mostly corn, squash, and beans. This civilization collapsed because of political unrest but also because of a drought. If the Natives had lived off of hunting and gathering, the way most people think they did, then the drought would have had little effect. But the drought caused the collapse of their intensive agriculture. This is an example of how climate disruption (in this case, a natural one) caused the collapse of a civilization, as explained in this Scientific American article. I will also write about this in Chapter 2 of my upcoming book.

Society enables a stability that allows humans to survive natural disasters. But sometimes these disasters can exceed the capacity of society to rescue the humans. The Mississippian civilization is an example. Most of the people survived, and they continued planting fields (just not as many), and the trade networks survived.



This is all that remains of Cahokia. We can only hope that our modern civilization does not disappear the way theirs did.

Friday, July 7, 2023

The Second Biggest City in the World that You Never Heard About: Spiro

It is the biggest city that you never heard about. It may well have been the second biggest city in the world somewhere between 1000 and 1250. Cahokia was bigger, but you’ve heard of it. We do not know what the population of Spiro was, partly because it may have been a ceremonial center for pilgrims who came but did not stay permanently. Why, then, have you never heard about it?

The city today is called Spiro, in eastern Oklahoma. Spiro is not on the way to anywhere. If you go any further north or east you end up in the Arkansas River. The area is poor and rural even by Oklahoma standards. But it was a center of prosperity and activity eight hundred years ago.

I visited Spiro Mounds in June 2023 (see the video here). They are hard to find. Even many local residents have never heard of it, and those who had could not give coherent directions to find it. We ended up using the Siri app. The day I was there, there was a family visiting. The rest of the time, it was just me and the director of the visitors’ center, who was not at all hopeful that the State of Oklahoma would keep the site running. The biggest remaining mound, Craig’s Mound, is an artificial reconstruction [photo].


I wrote earlier about Cahokia in Illinois and posted a video. All that remains of Cahokia are large earthen mounds built by Native Americans, one basket of soil at a time, in which bones and artifacts were buried. Warrior-priests lived in wooden structures on the flat mound tops. For square miles around the main mound (now called Monks Mound), workers (slaves?) lived in huts and grew vast fields of maize (corn, unknown at the time outside America) and other crops.

The Cahokia and Spiro empires were connected to the other empires by a vast trade network that covered most of the eastern deciduous forest. The trails were of dirt well pressed by thousands of feet. Trade goods were carried by hand, as there were no horses, oxen, or wheels. There was also extensive trade by boat. Spiro was within sight of the Arkansas River.

Trade goods were usually high-value decorative items. As far as we know, food was not usually transported, since the amount needed would weigh too much. Most of the food in Cahokia was corn, beans, and squash, with venison and “wild” nuts for protein. In Spiro, quinoa might have been more important than corn.

Remains of copper, shell, and sandstone artifacts have been found at Cahokia, and it is possible that perishable items such as clothes and blankets may have been imported. The shells came from the Gulf of Mexico. The copper came from the Great Lakes area. Though the Mississippian culture did not extend into Mexico, there was some trade with the Natives we collectively call “the Aztecs.” The artifacts on display at the Spiro Mounds Visitor Center were duplicates. The director explained to me that the location is so rural and high-crime that leaving the real artifacts in the building would invite plundering. Law enforcement would take at least a day to respond, after which time the items would be untraceable.

Nobody knows why the Mississippian civilization collapsed. There was apparently a major drought about 1300, but this might not have by itself caused food production to collapse. There was undoubtedly soil erosion caused by the intensive agriculture needed to feed the population, although this would also probably have not caused the collapse. Most likely, it was these two factors (and others?) working together.

You cannot see the Arkansas River today from Spiro Mounds, and even if the mounds were intact (see below) you probably could not. The view of the river is not blocked by modern buildings. It is blocked by pecan and boxelder trees which have grown back since European and white American occupation. Native Americans cut down small trees and used fire to clear away saplings and undergrowth. The Natives transformed the landscape not only by creating urban centers and by agriculture, but also by fire.

Even less remains of Spiro Mounds than of Cahokia. Spiro was sort of a second city to Cahokia in the Mississippian culture. As a matter of fact, the mounds themselves are gone. Nobody knows how big the mounds originally were. By the 1930s, farmers and ranchers near Spiro (in what used to be the Cherokee Nation of Indian Territory) noticed artifacts, some fancy, that showed up when they plowed their fields or grazed their cattle. The new land owners saw this as an opportunity to plunder the archaeological treasures and sell them.

The Pocola Mining Company was the only company whose sole purpose was to “mine” archaeological artifacts rather than minerals. They had no training in archaeology. They dug up artifacts and sold them directly to whoever wanted them. These artifacts went to private collectors and museums all over the world; some are even in the Louvre in Paris. A few have been located; others have been discarded by people who assumed they were fake trading-post items that the old folks left in the attic.

This plundering of artifacts was illegal under a federal law signed by Theodore Roosevelt. Since it was a federal law, it did not apply within Oklahoma until the artifacts crossed state lines—and some of them crossed national lines. But there was no enforcement of this law.

A scientist at the University of Oklahoma discovered what was going on, and he convinced the Oklahoma legislature to pass an antiquities act, one of the first of its kind at the state level. This might have protected whatever artifacts remained undiscovered, but the Pocola Mining Company went into overdrive to dig up everything they could before the law went into effect. They even broke up some shell artifacts into smaller ones, yielding a higher total profit. And then, just before they left, they wired the area and blew it up with dynamite. This was deliberate historical and cultural obliteration.

The state law protected whatever artifacts survived the plundering and dynamite. But then the professor went on sabbatical out of state. He was the only one watching the site, so when he left, the miners came back for more plunder.

We do not know who these people were. They left no writing for us to even try to decipher. We do not know what language they spoke or what they called their city or themselves. Based on artistic similarities in pottery, archaeologists have concluded that the Wichita and Caddo tribes are the physical descendants of the mound builders, although these modern tribes have no tradition or memory of a vast civilization.

Why have you never heard of the Mississippian civilization? This is the important question. Everyone has heard of the Mayans (the contemporaries of the Mississippians), the Aztecs, and the Incas. But popular racist images show Native Americans north of Mexico as being small populations of hunters and gatherers, leaving scarcely a footprint as they gathered berries and nuts and hunted deer. The reason this image is racist is that it justifies the conquest of North American tribes, who were not using the land to its full capacity, by civilized Europeans who transformed the landscape into a fruited plain with whitewashed cities, a process popularly called Manifest Destiny. What is sometimes called “revisionist history” proclaims the facts about the advanced Native American cultures. But this new view of history is attacked and maligned by conservative state legislatures.

The conservative racist (these are not necessarily the same things) viewpoint has been triumphant, because if you ask Americans about major precolumbian urban centers north of Mexico, very few will know anything about it. The myth of the savage, vanishing Red Man persists.

Sunday, June 25, 2023

The Biggest City in the World You Never Heard About: Cahokia

It is the biggest city that you never heard about. It may well have been the biggest city in the world somewhere between 1000 and 1250. With more than ten thousand inhabitants, this city was at least as large as London at the same time. Why, then, have you never heard about it?

The city today is called Cahokia, in southern Illinois. All that remains of it are large earthen mounds built by Native Americans, one basket of soil at a time, in which bones and artifacts were buried. Warrior-priests lived in wooden structures on the flat mound tops. For square miles around the main mound (now called Monks Mound), workers (slaves?) lived in huts and grew vast fields of maize (corn, unknown at the time outside America) and other crops. Except for the lack of brick and stone and cathedrals, it might have looked like a medieval English landscape. The main urban complex covered 1.8 square kilometers but associated areas covered many more square kilometers. All around Monks Mound, even several miles toward the west, there are other mounds, many of them large, though Monks Mound is the largest.




 

I visited Cahokia in June, 2023, and have posted a video about it [https://youtu.be/cqUPn9cWFkk ].

We do not know who these people were. They left no writing for us to even try to decipher. We do not know what language they spoke or what they called their city or themselves. Based on artistic similarities in pottery, archaeologists have concluded that the Wichita and Caddo tribes are the physical descendants of the mound builders, although these modern tribes have no tradition or memory of a vast civilization.

Cahokia was the center of a small empire. About five other empires were centered around similar mound-cities in North America, each a separate empire (we think). I will write about one other mound city, Spiro, in a later blog essay.

The Cahokia empire was connected to the other empires by a vast trade network that covered most of the eastern deciduous forest. The trails were of dirt well pressed by thousands of feet. Trade goods were carried by hand, as there were no horses, oxen, or wheels. There was also extensive trade by boat. Cahokia was within sight of the Mississippi River, which is why the culture is called the Mississippian Culture. Eight hundred years ago, the urban center was on the east bank, which today is an economically depressed area and includes East St. Louis. Today, St. Louis on the west bank fills the economic role that Cahokia had eight hundred years ago. Then as now, the Mississippi carried commercial shipping. Today, freeways (of which St. Louis has numerous large ones) have replaced trails.

Trade goods were usually high-value decorative items. As far as we know, food was not usually transported, since the amount needed would weigh too much. Most of the food was corn, beans, and squash, with venison and “wild” nuts for protein. Remains of copper, shell, and sandstone artifacts have been found, and it is possible that perishable items such as clothes and blankets may have been imported. The shells came from the Gulf of Mexico. The copper came from the Great Lakes area, and some of it was reshaped into new artifacts in a copper workshop at Cahokia. Pipe bowls were made from a soft light brown clay similar to that found today in the vicinity of Pipestone, Minnesota. Though the Mississippian culture did not extend into Mexico, there was some trade with the Natives we collectively call “the Aztecs.”

Nobody knows why the Mississippian civilization collapsed. There was apparently a major drought about 1300, but this might not have by itself caused food production to collapse. There was undoubtedly soil erosion caused by the intensive agriculture needed to feed the population, although this would also probably have not caused the collapse. Most likely, it was these two factors (and others?) working together.

You cannot see the Mississippi River today from even the top of Monks Mound, accessible by a modern stairway. The view of the river is not blocked by modern buildings. It is blocked by trees such as oak and elm which have grown back since European and white American occupation. Native Americans cut down small trees and used fire to clear away saplings and undergrowth. The Natives transformed the landscape not only by creating urban centers and by agriculture, but also by fire.

Why have you never heard of the Mississippian civilization? This is the important question. Everyone has heard of the Mayans (the contemporaries of the Mississippians), the Aztecs, and the Incas. But popular racist images show Native Americans north of Mexico as being small populations of hunters and gatherers, leaving scarcely a footprint as they gathered berries and nuts and hunted deer. The reason this image is racist is that it justifies the conquest of North American tribes, who were not using the land to its full capacity, by civilized Europeans who transformed the landscape into a fruited plain with whitewashed cities, a process popularly called Manifest Destiny. What is sometimes called “revisionist history” proclaims the facts about the advanced Native American cultures. But this new view of history is attacked and maligned by conservative state legislatures. There is even a law in Oklahoma that forbids the teaching of any history or sociology that would embarrass white Americans or make them feel inferior.

The conservative racist (these are not necessarily the same things) viewpoint has been triumphant, because if you ask Americans about major precolumbian urban centers north of Mexico, very few will know anything about it. The myth of the savage, vanishing Red Man persists.