I
recently finished reading Conrad Richter’s trilogy, The Awakening Land, which he finished in 1950. The three novels are
about the settlement of Ohio: The Trees,
about how pioneers carved out survival in a thick forest; The Fields, about how the pioneer settlements evolved into a little
village; and The Town, how the little
village became a major city in Ohio. The trilogy followed the life of a woman
named Sayward (Saird) Luckett, later Wheeler, who grew up in a cabin but by the
end of her life lived in a rich mansion. See a more detailed summary here.
At
first, I was disaffected by what seemed to be the author’s approach. Sayward
loved to cut trees down and to see others cut them down, for they represented a
fearful primordial forest. (The primordial forest at the beginning of the
trilogy, with leaves so dense that hardly any light penetrated throughout the
forest, never actually existed. There were disturbances before the arrival of
pioneers, especially fires set by nature or by the Natives.) Even into the
second novel, she was glad to see the trees out of the way. But I should have
known to expect something different before the end. Richter lived at a time
when conservation awareness was beginning to grow in America. And sure enough,
when Sayward was old, she realized that she missed the trees and the peaceful
shade that they brought. She planted some trees by her mansion, some of the few
trees in the city, and when she was dying she had her bed turned toward the
window to see them. She regretted taking the land away from the trees:
“Sometimes she wished she could give them back their land, for it was she who
had taken it from them.”
Even the
choice of the title, The Awakening Land,
implied that nature is asleep until humans roust it into usefulness. But
perhaps Richter intended this to be irony.
Although
beautifully written, the novels seemed primarily episodic. Some of these
episodes were funny, and some were beautiful: the chapter “Rosa’s Rainbow” was
one of the best short pieces I have read. The only overarching plot of the
trilogy was that the forest gave way to human progress. There was no structural
conflict to be resolved.
The
third novel did have a major plot: the romance that developed over many years
between Chancey Wheeler, Sayward’s youngest and sickly son, and the frail,
quiet, and thoughtful Rosa Tench. Everybody but them knew that they were
half-siblings. Rosa was born from an affair that Portius Wheeler, the father,
had with a schoolteacher when he was the master. But the two young people knew
only that the adults, for reasons not explained to them, condemned their
romance. I found myself hoping that this would reach a satisfactory resolution.
Rosa had to live with a poor family and never received recognition or even a
single word from the rich Wheeler family. I was hoping they would invite her
into their home. This did not happen. The resolution of this plot was gruesome
and occurred well before the end of the novel, which, as a direct result of
this, I did not want to read. Had I known what would happen, I might not have
read it. But it remains a beautiful piece of literature and a testament to the
development of the American attitude toward the land, which everyone except, at
the end, the main character, assumed was progress.
Your site is extremely helpful. Thanks for sharing!This a a great writing this website. I really hope to view the same high-grade content by you later on as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my very own blog now.
ReplyDeleteCalgary daycare